Logo-jcvtr

Submitted: 06 Jan 2025
Revision: 26 Oct 2025
Accepted: 18 Feb 2026
ePublished: 30 Jun 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2026;18(2): 103-108.
doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.33476
  Abstract View: 109
  PDF Download: 111

Original Article

Association of Value of Fibrosis-4 Index with Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: A Comparison Study with Fibrosis-5 Index

Halit Emre Yalvaç 1* ORCID logo, Fatih Enes Durmaz 2 ORCID logo, Bektaş Murat 1 ORCID logo, Selda Murat 3 ORCID logo

1 Department of Cardiology, Eskişehir City Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey
2 Department of Cardiology, Muş State Hospital, Muş, Turkey
3 Department of Cardiology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Halit Emre Yalvaç, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) indices are non-invasive biomarkers originally developed for hepatic fibrosis but may reflect systemic pathophysiological changes related to adverse cardiovascular prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether baseline FIB-4 and FIB-5 values predict long-term mortality in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 593 patients with HF who had available long-term mortality data. FIB-4 and FIB-5 indices were calculated at admission. Patients were followed for all-cause mortality, and outcomes were evaluated at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year intervals. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters were compared between survivors and non-survivors.

Results: During follow-up, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 24.6%, 39.0%, and 49.7%, respectively. Non-survivors had significantly higher FIB-4 and FIB-5 values compared with survivors (P<0.001 for both). ROC curve analyses demonstrated that both indices had significant predictive performance for long-term mortality. Optimal cut-off values showed good sensitivity and specificity for identifying high-risk patients.

Conclusion: Higher FIB-4 and FIB-5 values are associated with greater long-term mortality risk in HF patients. These indices may serve as practical, cost-effective prognostic biomarkers for mortality risk stratification in routine clinical care.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 110

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 111

Your browser does not support the canvas element.